Social Viewpoints for Arguing about Coalitions (bibtex)
by Guido Boella, Leendert van der Torre, Serena Villata
Abstract:
Frameworks for arguing about coalitions are based on non-monotonic logic and are therefore formal and abstract, whereas social theories about agent coalitions typically are based on conceptual modeling languages and therefore semi-formal and detailed. In this paper we bridge the gap between these two research areas such that social viewpoints can be used to argue about coalitions. We formally define three social viewpoints with abstraction and refinement relations among them, and we adapt an existing coalition argumentation theory to reason about the coalitions defined in the most abstract social viewpoint.
Reference:
Social Viewpoints for Arguing about Coalitions (Guido Boella, Leendert van der Torre, Serena Villata), In Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 11th Pacific Rim International Conference on Multi-Agents, PRIMA 2008, Hanoi, Vietnam, December 15-16, 2008. Proceedings (The Duy Bui, Tuong Vinh Ho, Quang-Thuy Ha, eds.), Springer, volume 5357, 2008.
Bibtex Entry:
@InProceedings{Boella2008a,
  Title                    = {Social Viewpoints for Arguing about Coalitions},
  Author                   = {Guido Boella and Leendert van der Torre and Serena Villata},
  Booktitle                = {Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 11th Pacific Rim International Conference on Multi-Agents, PRIMA 2008, Hanoi, Vietnam, December 15-16, 2008. Proceedings},
  Year                     = {2008},
  Editor                   = {The Duy Bui and Tuong Vinh Ho and Quang-Thuy Ha},
  Pages                    = {66-77},
  Publisher                = {Springer},
  Series                   = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
  Volume                   = {5357},

  Abstract                 = {Frameworks for arguing about coalitions are based on non-monotonic logic and are therefore formal and abstract, whereas social theories about agent coalitions typically are based on conceptual modeling languages and therefore semi-formal and detailed. In this paper we bridge the gap between these two research areas such that social viewpoints can be used to argue about coalitions. We formally define three social viewpoints with abstraction and refinement relations among them, and we adapt an existing coalition argumentation theory to reason about the coalitions defined in the most abstract social viewpoint.},
  Affiliation              = {icr},
  Bdsk-url-1               = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89674-6_10},
  Bibsource                = {DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de},
  Date-modified            = {2011-09-25 18:07:50 +0200},
  Ee                       = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89674-6_10},
  Timestamp                = {2013.07.26},
  Url                      = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89674-6_10}
}
Powered by bibtexbrowser