Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension (bibtex)
by Guido Boella, Souhila Kaci, Leendert van der Torre
Abstract:
In this paper we consider the dynamics of abstract argumentation in Baroni and Giacomin's framework for the evaluation of extension based argumentation semantics. Following Baroni and Giacomin, we do not consider individual approaches, but we define general principles or postulates that individual approaches may satisfy. In particular, we define abstraction principles for the attack relation, and for the arguments in the framework. We illustrate the principles on the grounded extension. In this paper we consider only principles for the single extension case, and leave the multiple extension case to further research.
Reference:
Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension (Guido Boella, Souhila Kaci, Leendert van der Torre), In Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 10th European Conference, ECSQARU 2009, Verona, Italy, July 1-3, 2009. Proceedings (Claudio Sossai, Gaetano Chemello, eds.), Springer, volume 5590, 2009.
Bibtex Entry:
@InProceedings{Boella2009j,
  Title                    = {Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension},
  Author                   = {Guido Boella and Souhila Kaci and Leendert van der Torre},
  Booktitle                = {Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 10th European Conference, ECSQARU 2009, Verona, Italy, July 1-3, 2009. Proceedings},
  Year                     = {2009},
  Editor                   = {Claudio Sossai and Gaetano Chemello},
  Pages                    = {107-118},
  Publisher                = {Springer},
  Series                   = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
  Volume                   = {5590},

  Abstract                 = {In this paper we consider the dynamics of abstract argumentation in Baroni and Giacomin's framework for the evaluation of extension based argumentation semantics. Following Baroni and Giacomin, we do not consider individual approaches, but we define general principles or postulates that individual approaches may satisfy. In particular, we define abstraction principles for the attack relation, and for the arguments in the framework. We illustrate the principles on the grounded extension. In this paper we consider only principles for the single extension case, and leave the multiple extension case to further research.},
  Affiliation              = {icr},
  Bdsk-url-1               = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_11},
  Bibsource                = {DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de},
  Date-modified            = {2011-09-25 17:46:33 +0200},
  Ee                       = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_11},
  ISBN                     = {978-3-642-02905-9},
  Timestamp                = {2013.07.26},
  Url                      = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_11}
}
Powered by bibtexbrowser