Meta-Argumentation Modelling I: Methodology and Techniques (bibtex)
by Guido Boella, Dov M. Gabbay, Leendert van der Torre, Serena Villata
Abstract:
In this paper, we introduce the methodology and techniques of meta-argumentation to model argumentation. The methodology of meta-argumentation instantiates Dung's abstract argumentation theory with an extended argumentation theory, and is thus based on a combination of the methodology of instantiating abstract arguments, and the methodology of extending Dung's basic argumentation frameworks with other relations among abstract arguments. The technique of meta-argumentation applies Dung's theory of abstract argumentation to itself, by instantiating Dung's abstract arguments with meta-arguments using a technique called flattening. We characterize the domain of instantiation using a representation technique based on soundness and completeness. Finally, we distinguish among various instantiations using the technique of specification languages.
Reference:
Meta-Argumentation Modelling I: Methodology and Techniques (Guido Boella, Dov M. Gabbay, Leendert van der Torre, Serena Villata), In Studia Logica, volume 93, 2009.
Bibtex Entry:
@Article{Boella2009n,
  Title                    = {Meta-Argumentation Modelling {I}: Methodology and Techniques},
  Author                   = {Guido Boella and Dov M. Gabbay and Leendert van der Torre and Serena Villata},
  Journal                  = {Studia Logica},
  Year                     = {2009},
  Number                   = {2-3},
  Pages                    = {297-355},
  Volume                   = {93},

  Abstract                 = {In this paper, we introduce the methodology and techniques of meta-argumentation to model argumentation. The methodology of meta-argumentation instantiates Dung's abstract argumentation theory with an extended argumentation theory, and is thus based on a combination of the methodology of instantiating abstract arguments, and the methodology of extending Dung's basic argumentation frameworks with other relations among abstract arguments. The technique of meta-argumentation applies Dung's theory of abstract argumentation to itself, by instantiating Dung's abstract arguments with meta-arguments using a technique called flattening. We characterize the domain of instantiation using a representation technique based on soundness and completeness. Finally, we distinguish among various instantiations using the technique of specification languages.},
  Affiliation              = {icr},
  Bdsk-url-1               = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-009-9213-2},
  Bibsource                = {DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de},
  Date-modified            = {2011-09-25 17:57:12 +0200},
  Ee                       = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-009-9213-2},
  Timestamp                = {2013.07.26},
  Url                      = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-009-9213-2}
}
Powered by bibtexbrowser