Permission from an Input/Output Perspective (bibtex)
by David Makinson, Leendert van der Torre
Abstract:
Input/output logics are abstract structures designed to represent conditional obligations and goals. In this paper we use them to study conditional permission. This perspective provides a clear separation of the familiar notion of negative permission from the more elusive one of positive permission. Moreover, it reveals that there are at least two kinds of positive permission. Although indistinguishable in the unconditional case, they are quite different in conditional contexts. One of them, which we call static positive permission, guides the citizen and law enforcement authorities in the assessment of specific actions under current norms, and it behaves like a weakened obligation. Another, which we call dynamic positive permission, guides the legislator. It describes the limits on the prohibitions that may be introduced into a code, and under suitable conditions behaves like a strengthened negative permission.
Reference:
Permission from an Input/Output Perspective (David Makinson, Leendert van der Torre), In Journal of Philosophical Logic, Springer Netherlands, volume 32, 2003. (10.1023/A:1024806529939)
Bibtex Entry:
@Article{Makinson2003a,
  Title                    = {Permission from an Input/Output Perspective},
  Author                   = {Makinson, David and van der Torre, Leendert},
  Journal                  = {Journal of Philosophical Logic},
  Year                     = {2003},
  Note                     = {10.1023/A:1024806529939},
  Pages                    = {391-416},
  Volume                   = {32},

  Abstract                 = {Input/output logics are abstract structures designed to represent conditional obligations and goals. In this paper we use them to study conditional permission. This perspective provides a clear separation of the familiar notion of negative permission from the more elusive one of positive permission. Moreover, it reveals that there are at least two kinds of positive permission. Although indistinguishable in the unconditional case, they are quite different in conditional contexts. One of them, which we call static positive permission, guides the citizen and law enforcement authorities in the assessment of specific actions under current norms, and it behaves like a weakened obligation. Another, which we call dynamic positive permission, guides the legislator. It describes the limits on the prohibitions that may be introduced into a code, and under suitable conditions behaves like a strengthened negative permission.},
  File                     = {http://icr.uni.lu/leonvandertorre/papers/jpl03.pdf},
  ISSN                     = {0022-3611},
  Issue                    = {4},
  Keyword                  = {Humanities, Social Sciences and Law},
  Publisher                = {Springer Netherlands},
  Timestamp                = {2013.07.26},
  Url                      = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024806529939}
}
Powered by bibtexbrowser