@InProceedings{Torre01BDIandQDT,
  Title                    = {BDI and QDT: a comparison based on classical decision theory},
  Author                   = {Dastani, M. and Hulstijn, J. and van der Torre, L.},
  Booktitle                = {Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents (GTDT2001)},
  Year                     = {2001},
  Pages                    = {16-26},
  Publisher                = {AAAI Press},

  Abstract                 = {In this paper we compare Beliefs-Desire-Intention sys-
tems (BDI systems) with Qualitative Decision Theory
(QDT). Our analysis based on classical decision theory
illustrates several issues where one area may profit from
research in the other area. BDI has studied how inten-
tions link subsequent decisions, whereas QDT has stud-
ied methods to calculate candidate goals from desires,
and how to derive intentions from goals. We also dis-
cuss the role of goals and norms in both approaches.},
  Bdsk-url-1               = {http://icr.uni.lu/leonvandertorre/papers/aaaiss01b.pdf},
  Date-modified            = {2011-12-20 17:14:40 +0100},
  Url                      = {http://icr.uni.lu/leonvandertorre/papers/aaaiss01b.pdf}
}