@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/aldt/PigozziST09,
	Abstract = {Judgment aggregation is a formal theory reasoning about how a group of agents can aggregate individual judgments on connected propositions into a collective judgment on the same propositions. Three procedures for successfully aggregating judgments sets are: premise-based procedure, conclusion-based procedure and distance-based merging. The conclusion-based procedure has been little investigated because it pro- vides a way to aggregate the conclusions, but not the premises, thus it outputs an incomplete judgment set. The goal of this paper is to present a conclusion-based procedure outputting complete judgment sets.},
	Affiliation = {icr},
	Author = {Gabriella Pigozzi and Marija Slavkovik and Leendert van der Torre},
	Bibsource = {DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de},
	Booktitle = {Algorithmic Decision Theory, First International Conference, ADT 2009, Venice, Italy, October 20-23, 2009. Proceedings},
	Date-Added = {2011-11-16 16:03:59 +0100},
	Date-Modified = {2011-11-16 16:03:59 +0100},
	Editor = {Francesca Rossi and Alexis Tsouki{\`a}s},
	Ee = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_1},
	Isbn = {978-3-642-04427-4},
	Pages = {1-13},
	Publisher = {Springer},
	Series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
	Title = {A Complete Conclusion-Based Procedure for Judgment Aggregation},
	Volume = {5783},
	Year = {2009}}