@proceedings{DBLP:conf/context/1999,
  bibsource = {DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de},
  booktitle = {CONTEXT},
  editor = {Paolo Bouquet and Luciano Serafini and Patrick Br{\'e}zillon and Massimo Benerecetti and F. Castellani},
  isbn = {3-540-66432-7},
  publisher = {Springer},
  series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
  title = {Modeling and Using Context, Second International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT'99, Trento, Italy, September 1999, Proceedings},
  volume = {1688},
  year = {1999}
}
@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/context/Torre99,
  abstract = {In this paper we discuss the role of context and independence in normative reasoning. First, deontic operators - obligations, prohibitions, permissions - referring to the ideal context may conflict with operators referring to a violation (or contrary-to-duty) context. Second, deontic independence is a powerful concept to derive deontic operators from such operators of other violation contexts. These two concepts are used to determine how to proceed once a norm has been violated, a key issue of deontic logic applications in computer science. We also show how violation contexts and deontic independence can be used to give a new analysis of several notorious paradoxes of deontic logic. },
  author = {Leendert W. N. van der Torre},
  bibsource = {DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de},
  booktitle = {CONTEXT},
  crossref = {DBLP:conf/context/1999},
  ee = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48315-2_28},
  pages = {361-374},
  slides = {http://icr.uni.lu/leonvandertorre/papers/context99-slides.ps.Z},
  title = {Violation Contexts and Deontic Independence},
  url = {http://icr.uni.lu/leonvandertorre/papers/context99.ps.Z},
  year = {1999},
  bdsk-url-1 = {http://icr.uni.lu/leonvandertorre/papers/context99.ps.Z}
}