@inproceedings{Torre04CombiningGoal,
  abstract = {We study conflicts between goals and plans in Dung’s abstract
argumentation framework. Argumentation theory has traditionally
been used to deal with conflicts between defaults and
beliefs. Recently Amgoud has proposed to use it for conflicts
between plans. Amgoud argues that Dung’s argumentation
theory has to be adjusted, because conflicts between plans
are fundamentally different from conflicts between defaults.
We agree with the fundamental difference, but we propose an
alternative way to deal with conflicts between plans that stays
within Dung’s framework. Moreover, we extend Amgoud’s
argumentation framework for planning with goal generation
procedures, that can deal with conflicts between goals. In the
proposed framework goals are derived from desires by forward
reasoning, and plans are derived from goals and planning
rules by backward reasoning.},
  author = {Hulstijn, J. and van der Torre, L.},
  booktitle = {Proc Proceedings NMR'04},
  title = {Combining goal generation and planning in an argumentation framework},
  url = {http://icr.uni.lu/leonvandertorre/papers/nmr04.pdf},
  year = {2004}
}